Picture from: http://windsockweb.com/photos/DaVinci.jpg
The Theory©
I’ve divided my analysis into two parts – the structure and the current team.
Structure Points
What I’m saying here is that to be successful, a team needs to have certain basic elements in place. You have to competent players of the right size and skill, but that’s true of most of the top ten sides, so what are the differentiators?
The coach is very important, if he’s not competent with a decent record you are going nowhere, so that’s worth up to 10 points.
Captain – a captain who is a dead cert on form, and a born leader 10 points
Scrum half and fly half are the two most important play making positions. I think it’s important to have two clearly identified individuals here as they determine your whole pattern of play, and if you are chopping and changing them you have no settled gameplan. You get up to 10 points for each of these.
Fetcher. It’s vitally important to recognize the importance of fetcher, and have a good player in that position. Being able to turn ball over gives you an edge in disruptive broken field play, and opportunites to score tries. Up to 5 points
With a good structure in place, even if key individuals are missing the structure can carry the team.
Team points
These are awarded for key positions, it’s a given that the other players are competent and capable. Up to 5 points each.
Fly Half
Scrumhalf
Kicker
Fetcher
Hooker
Line out Jumper – someone who you can guarantee to win your own ball and steal the odd ball as well
Gamebreaker Improved defenses mean that Union and League are converging, someone who can all that on its head is like rocking horse poo.
New Zealand 96%
Australia 93%
France 91%
Wales 90%
Ireland 88%
South Africa 88%
Scotland 84%
England 79%
According to my formula, Wales are under performing, and England are under performing against their world rankings. Let me know what you think (politely!)
P-Divvy gets a 10? Not in a million years, he inherited a World-Cup winning side and has been more of a hindrance to them since.
ReplyDeleteAlso, not sure if the formula is flawed, double scoring for the same position?
Other then that - I like it! :-)